To:
Teachers of Constitutional Law in high school
From:
Rich Kitchens, Director,
Constitutional Law Education Project (CLEP) (http://conlawed.com) (Email us at: rich@conlawed.com)
Sub:
Newsletter #469 (October
16, 2011)
This is an occasional FREE newsletter for the teachers of Constitutional
Law (4th) and others interested in teaching such a subject to
high school students. Currently, it goes out to more than 160 teachers.
It is organized to suggest strategies in each of the five units in the Constitutional Law (4th)
text. Of course, you can use any of this information without the text
as well. More information can be obtained by using the Teacher’s Guide to
Constitutional Law (4th), published by the CLEP.
If you
wish to be removed from this newsletter mailing list, please reply with the
designation “Remove” in the subject box.
Please let us know what you would like to see in this newsletter
as it evolves. To view past issues of the newsletter, contact Rich Kitchens at
our email address. To see Rich Kitchens’ classroom, check out: http://www.edutopia.org/room-learn-speak-your-mind
=====================================================
General Articles, Hints and Reminders:
Secret U.S. Memo Made Legal Case to Kill a
Citizen [NY
Times, 10/8/11]: The Obama
administration’s secret legal memorandum that opened the door to the killing of
Anwar al-Awlaki, the American-born radical Muslim cleric hiding in Yemen, found
that it would be lawful only if it were not feasible to take him alive,
according to people who have read the document.
Former Supreme Court justice now pushing
education [Chicago Tribune, 10/16/11]:
After more than 24 years in the U.S. Supreme Court, former Justice Sandra Day
O'Connor now strives to make civics and government more interesting for young
children than it was for her growing up in El Paso, Texas.
I. Introduction to Law, the Constitution, and the Supreme Court
[See
TOPICS 1-10 in the 4th edition of Constitutional Law]
Some
recent articles that are relevant to this unit:
The
Clarence Thomas' Influence On The Supreme Court [NPR, All Things Considered,
10/12/11]: Twenty years ago, Justice
Clarence Thomas was confirmed to the Supreme Court by the narrowest margin in
100 years. He's the most conservative justice since the 1930s, and, in his
passion for his own version of "original intent," he's willing to
reverse whole lines of previous rulings. He's an enigmatic figure — silent at
oral arguments, beloved by his law clerks and court employees. Most analysts
say that his extreme views limit his influence on the court, except to set
markers for where a future court could go. NPR's Nina Totenberg reports.
http://www.npr.org/2011/10/11/141246695/clarence-thomas-influence-on-the-court
II. Defining the Political System: Federalism and Checks and
Balances
[See
TOPICS 11-15 in the 4th edition of Constitutional Law]
Some
recent articles that are relevant to this unit:
Under the U.S. Supreme Court: Healthcare in the
hands of an angry court [UPI,
10/9/11]: The bitter fight over healthcare is rolling toward
the U.S. Supreme Court like a big wheel, destined for a probable resolution of
the legal and constitutional debate, if not the large political debate. While
Republicans use the Affordable Care Act as a hammer against embattled Democrats
across the nation—a spot prepared for the West Virginia gubernatorial race was
airing on Washington television, citing unnamed “experts” who said the law
would destroy jobs—the fight in the nation’s highest court is supposed to be
non-political. Except it won’t be. Not completely.
The American Presidency [TOPIC 15]
For Obama Campaign, It's Game On Vs. Romney [Politico,
10/13/11]: Mitt Romney hasn’t won anything yet but President Barack Obama’s
campaign team is confident enough that Romney is the probable - if not the
presumptive - Republican nominee that they have begun aiming their fire almost
exclusively at him.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/65827.html
Obama Plans To Turn Anti-Wall Street Anger On Mitt Romney,
Republicans [Wash Post, 10/15/11]: President
Obama and his team have decided to turn public anger at Wall Street into a
central tenet of their reelection strategy.
III.
The Political System: Voting and Campaigns
[See TOPICS
16-20 in the 4th edition of Constitutional Law]
Some recent
articles that are relevant to this unit:
Herman Cain and the Non-Politician
Politician [Sabato’s
Crystal Ball, 10/6/11]: n the last election
cycle, several “non-politician politicians” — candidates who have never held
public office who ran for a major office — went from obscurity to high office.
These non-politician politicians include Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI), Gov. Rick
Snyder (R-MI) and Gov. Rick Scott (R-FL), all 2010 winners. Bob Turner, the
upset Republican winner of the New York Ninth Congressional District special
election last month, is another good example. And now, a non-politician
politician — Herman Cain — is making what appears to be, at first blush, a
credible campaign for the highest office in the land.
http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/KDK2011100601/
Republicans Increasingly See Mitt Romney As The
‘Inevitable Candidate’ [Wash Post, 10/13/11]: Buoyed by a series of
strong debate performances, Mitt Romney is suddenly attracting new support from
major donors and elected officials, some of whom had resisted his previous
entreaties, as people across the GOP grow more accepting of the presidential
contender as the party’s standard-bearer.
Primary Madness: The Eternal Campaign [Sabato’s Crystal Ball, 10/13/11]: With 13 months still to go before the end of another
presidential cycle that began the day after the last one finished, it’s worth
asking: Does it have to be this way? The First Amendment guarantees candidates
an unfettered campaign of indeterminate length. If you wanted, you could today
declare for president in 2016 or beyond. A handful of ambitious politicians
have doubtless already written the announcement in their heads. Luckily for the
rest of us, they will say nothing publicly.
http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/LJS2011101301/
California Voters More Cynical About Ballot
Measures, Field Poll Finds [Sac Bee, 10/13/11]:As it hits its 100th birthday,
California's initiative process is losing its luster. But followers of Hiram
Johnson's landmark move toward direct democracy can take heart: the Legislature
has even bigger problems.
http://www.sacbee.com/2011/10/13/3977598/california-voters-more-cynical.html
Fensterwald: Teacher Evaluation Bill 2012
Priority [Educated Guess, 10/13/11]: A bill that would
vastly change how teachers are evaluated is 75 percent of the way there, the
bill’s sponsor, Assemblyman Felipe Fuentes, reports.
http://toped.svefoundation.org/2011/08/30/teacher-evaluation-bill-2012-priority/
[See
TOPICS 21-28 in the 4th edition of Constitutional Law]
Some recent
articles that are relevant to this unit:
Under the U.S. Supreme Court: Unreliable
eyewitnesses put defendants on death row [UPI, 10/16/11]: Does the routine use of eyewitnesses in American
criminal cases contribute to trials that put innocent people behind bars—even
on death row? Evidence suggests it does. The U.S. Supreme Court is getting
ready to hear a case out of New Hampshire that deals with a subtle but
important point in the witness process.
Gallup Poll: 35% oppose death penalty
[USA TODAY, 10/13/11]: More than
one-third of Americans now oppose the death penalty — the highest level in
nearly 40 years — according to a Gallup Poll out Thursday.
California's Execution Machine Could Crank Up CC Times, 10/16/11]:
Amid renewed efforts to repeal California's death
penalty and nearly six years into a de facto moratorium on executions, San
Quentin's death row has quietly piled up an unprecedented number of inmates who
have exhausted their legal appeals and would face imminent death by lethal
injection if the state resumes carrying out the ultimate punishment.
http://www.contracostatimes.com/politics-government/ci_19123019
Supreme Court has trouble balancing
strip-searches with privacy rights [Wash Post / NY Times / CSM,
10/12/11]: The Supreme Court on Wednesday had
trouble drawing a boundary for how intimately corrections officials may search
those entering jail without violating constitutional
rights of privacy. After an hour of often graphic arguments about
strip-searches and body-cavity inspections, the justices seemed to accept that
even those picked up for minor violations could be required to strip and shower
under the watchful eyes of jailers.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/13/us/strip-search-argument-before-supreme-court-justices.html
Read and hear
and see the PBS presentation on the Evening News Hour:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/law/july-dec11/scotus_10-12.html
Feds To Target Newspapers, Radio For Marijuana
Ads [Cal Watch, 10/13/11]: Federal prosecutors are preparing to target
newspapers, radio stations and other media outlets that advertise medical
marijuana dispensaries in California, another escalation in the Obama
administration's newly invigorated war against the state's pot industry.
http://californiawatch.org/dailyreport/feds-target-newspapers-radio-marijuana-ads-13049
The Supreme Court: When Double Jeopardy Isn't
Double Jeopardy [Time,
10/14/11]: Even Americans who know very little about the Constitution know this
much: once a jury decides you are innocent of a crime, the government can’t
keep hauling you back into court to try your case over again….But like most
truisms in American law…there are exceptions large enough to drive a prison bus
through.
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2096915,00.html
V. 1st Amendment (Speech, Religion, Press and
Assembly)
[See
TOPICS 29-33 in the 4th edition of Constitutional Law]
Some recent
articles that are relevant to this unit:
‘Occupy’
protests, tea party rallies: assembly, petition in action [First
Amendment Center, 10/14/11]: The
“Occupy Wall Street” movement and its rapidly spreading urban echoes are —
like the tea party movement — grand examples of Americans using at least two of
our lesser-known First Amendment freedoms: assembly and petition.
N.J.
district probes teacher’s Facebook remarks on gays [AP /
First Amendment Center, 10/14/11]: Officials in a New Jersey school district are
investigating claims that a high school teacher who advises a prayer group
posted remarks on her Facebook page that described homosexuality as “perverted”
and said it “breeds like cancer.”
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/n-j-district-probes-teacher%E2%80%99s-facebook-remarks-on-gays
What’s
at stake for free speech in copyright case [First Amendment Center,
10/12/11 Removal of many foreign works from the public
domain — at issue before the Supreme Court in Golan v. Holder — burdens
freedom of expression.
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/whats-at-stake-for-free-speech-in-copyright-case
At the high court, high stakes for religious
freedom
[Charles C. Haynes of the First Amendment Center, 10/7/11]: A church-state
dispute about employment discrimination argued before the U.S. Supreme Court
this week doesn’t have the headline appeal of culture-war battles over “prayer
in school” or crèches in courthouse lobbies. But pay close attention: The
outcome in Hosanna-Tabor
Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission may have far more impact on religious freedom than
any ruling handed down by the high court in more than a decade.
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/at-the-high-court-high-stakes-for-religious-freedom
Suit Settled Over Denial
of Muslim Teacher's Pilgrimage [School Law Blog, 10/11/11]: The U.S.
Department of Justice has reached a consent decree with an Illinois school
district over a lawsuit alleged.
http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/school_law/2011/10/suit_settled_over_denial_of_mu.html
In Private, Wall St. Bankers Dismiss Protesters As
Unsophisticated [NY Times, 10/15/11]: Publicly,
bankers say they understand the anger at Wall Street — but believe they are
misunderstood by the protesters camped on their doorstep. But when they speak
privately, it is often a different story.
VI. 14th Amendment, Discrimination, Privacy, Working,
Citizenship & Immigration
[See TOPICS
34-41 in the 4th edition of Constitutional Law]
Some recent
articles that are relevant to this unit:
Bid To Reverse California School Instruction Bill
Won't Qualify [Capitol Alert, 10/13/11]: An effort to repeal a
new law requiring that California school instruction includes the contributions
and role of gay and lesbian individuals has failed.
California Schools Scrambling To Add Lessons On LGBT
Americans [LA Times, 10/16/11]: Many are
flummoxed about how to carry out a new law requiring California public schools
to teach all students, from kindergartners to 12th-graders, about lesbian, gay,
bisexual and transgender Americans.
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/education/la-me-gay-schools-20111016,0,3906923.story
Freedman: The Seven Broken Premises Of Special
Education In California [ToPEd, 10/13/11]:It’s not a typo. It’s meant to
be an “e.” Today’s special education system is built on many broken premises
that detract from the law’s purpose: to provide students with disabilities
(SWD) a free, appropriate public education in the least restrictive
(appropriate) environment so that they can learn and make progress.
Supreme Court: Ministerial Exception [“Religion and Ethics Newsweekly,” PBS, 10/14/11]: The case involves Cheryl Perich, a fourth-grade teacher at a
Lutheran Church Missouri-Synod school in Michigan who mainly taught secular
subjects, but also taught religion and led prayers. She took a leave of absence
to get treatment for a sleep disorder. When the school was reluctant to let her
return, she threatened to sue for violation of the Americans With Disabilities
Act.
GOP: Gays Don't Need Special Legal Protections [SF Chron, 10/15/11]:
With more than half of Americans in a recent poll
accepting same-sex marriage, gays and lesbians need no judicial protection from
laws passed by Congress, House Republicans argued Friday in a San Francisco
court in defense of a law denying federal benefits to same-sex spouses
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/10/15/BANT1LI0F4.DTL
Court blocks Ala. from
checking student status [AP, 10/14/11]: A federal appeals court issued a ruling Friday
that temporarily blocked parts of an Alabama law requiring schools to check the
immigration status of students but let stand a provision that allows police to
detain immigrants that are suspected of being in the country illegally.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_ALABAMA_IMMIGRATION_LAW?SITE
At Rallies, 2 Candidates Deliver Blistering Attacks On Illegal
Immigration[NY Times, 10/16/11]: Two Republican candidates vying for of the
party’s conservative base issued full-throated attacks Saturday on illegal
immigration.
=========================================================